青松's profileChina Tax BlogPhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
|
November 01 中国的立法技术近日研修刑法,不觉对中国的立法技术哑然。
有关偷税罪条目:
第二百零一条 纳税人采取伪造、变造、隐匿、擅自销毁帐簿、记帐凭证,在帐簿上多列支出或者不列、少列收入,经税务机关通知申报而拒不申报或者进行虚假的纳税申报的手段,不缴或者少缴应纳税款,偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之十以上不满百分之三十并且偷税数额在一万元以上不满十万元的,或者因偷税被税务机关给予二次行政处罚又偷税的,处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,并处偷税数额一倍以上五倍以下罚金;偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之三十以上并且偷税数额在十万元以上的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑,并处偷税数额一倍以上五倍以下罚金。 扣缴义务人采取前款所列手段,不缴或者少缴已扣、已收税款,数额占应缴税额的百分之十以上并且数额在一万元以上的,依照前款的规定处罚。
问题:偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之十以上不满百分之三十并且偷税数额在一万元以上不满十万元的+偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之三十以上并且偷税数额在十万元以上的=全集?
偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之三十并且偷税数额在一万元以上不满十万元的,或者偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之十以上不满百分之三十并且偷税数额在十万元以上的,不构成偷税罪?道理上好像说不通,怎么着这俩也比“偷税数额占应纳税额的百分之十以上不满百分之三十并且偷税数额在一万元以上不满十万元的”恶劣啊,怎么会不构成偷税罪?法无明文不定罪?如果定罪,如何量刑?
嗯,从税务上看,10%看来可以成为一个在tax planning和tax evasion之间的safe harbour,纳税人可以好好利用一下——不管怎么说,构不成刑事责任总是好的。 August 15 外资并购的中国式管制不得不感慨,在中国做事必须面临法律层面的不确定性
马光远:外资并购的中国式管制
当凯雷收购徐工前途未卜,外资并购危害国家经济安全的争议甚嚣尘上的时候,商务部等国家六部委联合发布了《关于外国投资者并购境内企业的规定》。该《规定》细化了2003年出台的相关规定,条文从原来的26条增加到61条,增强了操作性,特别是突出了对外资并购国内企业可能危害国家经济安全的审查程序,同时,将境内企业通过在境外设立离岸公司,实现境外上市的红筹模式纳入了严格的监管范围,以防止资本的外逃和海外上市中国有资产的流失。这些重大的变化引起了业界的广泛关注,如何理解《规定》的实质内涵,监管当局如何对《规定》加以贯彻落实,《规定》设定的一些审批程序会不会对中国的投资环境造成负面的影响,成为大家十分关注和忧虑的问题。
从当前全球资本市场的发展脉络和逻辑来看,并购已经成为全球资本流动和配置的主旋律,外资对中国的投资方式已经告别了青春期的躁动和盲目,从直接的投资建厂为主过渡到以收购中国企业股权为主的间接投资阶段,在外资并购的大潮中,基础设施、石油、金融、机械制造等领域成了外资并购的热点,一些知名品牌“迷失”了自己,或被外资吞并,或被外资挤垮,外资已经鲸吞蚕食了一些产业的半壁江山。在此情况下,制定外资收购的“国家安全标准”,对国家的重点产业和领域进行认真研究,对有可能危害国家经济安全的并购行为加以规制,这是任何一个国家的法律都不可能坐视不管的。连美国这样的世界第一强国,都对有可能影响国家经济安全的外资并购行为也加以严格审查,我们更无可厚非。关键是如何在法规里正确、清楚地界定属于国家经济安全和命脉的重点产业和领域。
根据《规定》:“外来投资并购境内企业并取得实际控制权,涉及重点行业、存在影响或可能影响国家经济安全因素或者导致拥有驰名商标或中华老字号的境内企业实际控制权转移的,当事人应就此向商务部进行申报。”这条规定,除了“商务部”三个字属于不会产生歧义,其他的规定和立法所要求的“确定性”相去甚远,什么是重点领域?对哪些驰名商标需要保护,中华老字号的范围又是什么?都让人无所适从。按照企业并购的“定价规则”,这种法律不确定风险只能导致任何一个理性的投资者在收购中国企业时对企业的价值按照政策风险的大小大打折扣,这是一个基本的游戏规则。在法律规定模棱两可的情况下,所谓重点产业的“界定”完全取决于商务部执法人员的“自由心证”和“主观归罪”,大大拓展了执法者在行政审批过程中的“寻租”空间,增加了交易费用,造成整个并购过程的非效率。更让人忧虑的是,对于当事人没有按照规定向商务部予以申报的项目,其处理程序完全“行政化”,直接规定“商务部可以会同相关部门要求当事人终止交易或采取转让相关股权、资产或其他有效措施”。既没有给并购双方提供司法救济的途径,甚至连基本的行政复议的程序都没有,在一种情绪化的鼓噪下完全漠视了起码的“程序公正”的精神,这是和中央一再倡导建立的政治文明背道而驰的,也是和公认的有限行政的法治原则相悖的。
立法的随意和非衔接性还体现在对境内企业设立离岸公司,实现在境外间接上市的监管上。近些年,大量国内资本通过离岸公司外逃,对国家金融秩序和经济安全确实造成了很大的危害,这和监管存在“真空”不无关系,将资本外逃纳入正常的监管是必要的。《规定》通过设立严格的审批程序——境内公司在境外设立特殊目的公司,要经过国家商务部、证监会与外管局的三道审批,而在此之前,这仅仅需要外管局批准即可。在打击资本外逃的同时,无疑增加了“红筹上市模式”的审批程序和不确定性,对那些以海外上市为主要退出通道的风险投资基金而言无疑又遭遇了一次“多头马车”国情下政策和法律环境不确定的沉重打击。
按照管理学大师迈克尔·波特在其风靡全球的巨著《国家竞争优势》中提出的“钻石”理论,法律环境会直接影响经济生态,从而影响一个国家的经济安全,决定一个国家竞争力的关键是政府的公共政策和完善的法律系统。布坎南指出:“我们的时代面临的不是经济方面的挑战,而是制度和政治方面的挑战。”《关于外国投资者并购境内企业的规定》存在的种种不尽如人意之处,暴露了中国在公共政策制定方面的随意性和不确定性,这种制度的缺陷才是影响中国经济安全的最大隐患。我们寄希望于《规定》操作细则的出台和进一步的完善,寄希望于审批机关按照《行政许可法》的相关规定,严格界定自己的操作行为,避免政策的负面影响,对国家经济安全造成更大的制度性的危害。 June 13 Revise of PRC Company Law, Implications for Foreign Investment EnterprisesChina’s Foreign Investment Enterprise (FIE) legal regime began to take shape in 1979 -- long before the 1993 promulgation of its Company Law,[1] for the purpose of governing all enterprises, resulted in differences between the two legal regimes. These differences have been clarified and somewhat reduced by the recently issued Opinion on Application of Laws Concerning Approval and Registration of FIEs (FIE Opinion),[2] which specifies the effects on FIEs of last year’s amendments to the Company Law and related regulations (“Amended Company Regulations”) on capital contribution[3] and company registration.[4]
In addition to the general principle of PRC Legislation Law that "specific laws prevail over general laws"[5], the Company Law, both before and after its recent amendment, also states that its provisions apply to FIEs except where FIE-specific laws provide differently]” (emphasis added).[6] This statement has always been open to interpretation, in part because, in the FIE legal regime, the line has not always been clear between regulatory requirements, recommended practices and customary practices.[7]
The resulting grey areas often resulted in FIE-related customary practices, even of local government departments, prevailing in practice over the Company Law, in contradiction to the generally applicable rules on resolving differences between different types of laws and regulations.[8]
Those grey areas are now reduced due to the FIE Opinion, which addresses a number of detailed issues after first echoing the relevant Company Law statements, and then stating that “State Council administrative rules, regulations and decisions” governing FIEs shall apply where the amended Company Law and the Amended Company Regulations and the FIE-specific Law are silent.[9]
Documents for FIE Establishment/Expansion Approval & Registration
Both notarisation and consularisation are now required of each foreign investor’s (or later foreign purchaser’s) status documents (a foreign enterprise’s certificate of incorporation, business registration, good standing certificate or equivalent, and a foreign natural person investor’s passport or other photographic identification certificate).[10]
An agent/representative, for receipt of delivery of legal documents (‘service of process’), of each foreign investor (including a foreign purchaser of equity) in an FIE must be appointed through submission[11] of a formal written delegation instrument, often translated as a “power of attorney”, which is required to be updated to reflect any change in the agent/representative’s name or address.[12]
30 days after approval remains the period within which registration must be completed by for FIEs,[13] whether for new establishment or for later amendments in key documents, in comparison with the 90 day period that domestically owned enterprises now enjoy under the Amended Company Regulations.[14]
There has been reduction of FIE document duplication, between an FIE’s “examination and approval” by the examination and approval authority authorized by MOFCOM and its registration with the local AIC. The latter registration no longer requires submission of joint venture contracts or a foreign investor’s bank credit reference letter.[15]
Organizational Structure
Only EJVs and CJVs remain unaffected by the provisions of the amended Company Law on organizational structure, which now apply to WFOEs -- according to the FIE Opinion.[16] The provisions extended to WFOEs apparently include (i) required appointment of an executive director and (if the WFOE is not very large and only has one or two supervisors,[17] along with (ii) flexibility in the appointment of a company’s “legal representative”, which was previously required to the company’s chairman, but is now permitted to be a company’s [manager, or executive director].[18] A board of shareholders must be organized for a WFOE unless it has only [one investor].[19]
FIE Business License Classification
An FIE’s Business License is now required to display more information about the FIE’s type,[20] such as "Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture", "Sino-foreign Co-operative Joint Venture", "Wholly Owned by Foreign Legal Person", "Wholly Owned by Foreign [Non-legal Person Economic Organization])" and, for a Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture [or other FIE] that is a "Company Limited by Shares", designation of “Listed” or “Un-Listed” (on a stock exchange).
Capital Contributions
Both a domestically owned enterprise[[21]] and an FIE[22] now can be capitalized by contribution of any non-cash asset that can be monetarily valued and legally transferred, notably including equity ownership of other enterprises. Moreover, a contributor that holds less than an ownership interest in a non-cash item now can contribute a lesser interest, such as a usage right under a license of intellectual property, or a leasehold interest under a lease, rather than the less tax-efficient approach of sub-licensing or sub-leasing that interest. [KW: there is no written provision that usage right can be used for capital contribution, it's purely a TEXTUAL ANALYSIS for the requirement of capital contribution: monetarily valuable and legally transferable.] Capitalization is still not permitted by means of contributing labour services, credit, a natural person’s (as opposed to an enterprise’s) name, credit standing, a franchising right, or mortgaged property [(both movable and immovable)].[23]
Newly established FIEs’ capital contribution deadlines remain substantially unchanged.[24] But when an increase in registered capital has been approved, 20% of it must be contributed at the time of registration, both for a domestically owned enterprise[25] and for an FIE[26] (other than a foreign-invested company limited by shares that is not established by means of promotion).[27]
The FIE Opinion reaffirms[28] that an investor [(both foreign and domestic)] in an FIE contributing borrowed money holds the same ownership as any other investor.[29]
Equity Pledge-Holder Protection
Holders of pledges over FIE equity now benefit from a right to receive pledge registration certificates from the relevant registration authority (AIC),[30] and from confirmation of the previously implied prohibition against the [“contributed” (subscribed)] capital of an FIE being reduced without the consent of all equity pledge holders.[31]
FIE Onward Investment
FIEs, like domestically owned enterprises, are now much less restricted in the timing and amount of their investments in other enterprises, being free[32] to invest more than the previous[33] limit of 50% of their net asset value, and also being released from the previous requirement that they obtain a "Certificate of Qualification for Domestic Investment"[34]. This means that the previous qualification criteria will no longer apply: (i) completed contribution of all subscribed registered capital, (ii) “beginning to earn a profit”, (generally require to be supported by audited financial reports), along with (iii) operations being conducted without violation of law. [35]
One-Owner Limited Liability Company
One-owner WFOEs have long been permitted,[36] but a one-owner domestic limited liability company has only now become possible under the amended Company Law, subject to certain restrictions, some of which will now be applied to one-owner WFOEs. The Company Law requires that (i) a “natural” (individual) person can only establish one one-owner LLC, which cannot in turn establish or invest in any other one-person LLC, (ii) a natural person owner LLC must have registered capital of at least RMB 100,000.[37]
The FIE Opinion reconfirms that a foreign-invested one natural person owner LLC-form WFOE is subject to the above registered capital requirements, and is not permitted to establish or invest in another one-owner LLC. It clarifies that these restrictions do not invalidate different arrangements previously approved for this form of WFOE established prior to 1 January 2006, but will apply to any application of an existing WFOE for approval of a change in the amount of registered capital, or for a new investment in another company.[38] The FIE Opinion also clarifies that this form of WFOE is not covered by the amended Company Law’s requirement that registered capital be contributed in one instalment.[39]
FIE Liaison Offices
Liaison offices are popular vehicles for FIEs to expand their businesses in China due to their simple regulatory structure and efficient tax features. The Implementation Rules on the Administration of the Registration of Legal Entities, issued by the SAIC in 1988 and revised in 1996 and 2000 respectively ("Legal Entities Registration Rules"), established the policy basis for setting up liaison offices to conduct liaison and public relation activities.[40] The Revised Company Registration Regulations, which abolish Legal Entities Registration Rules, however, do not contain any provisions on liaison offices, and instead detail requirements to set up branches of domestic companies. The SAIC thus holds that the Revised Company Registration Regulations and other relevant rules no longer provide a legal basis for the establishment and maintenance of representative offices. Following the promulgation of the Law of the PRC on Administrative Permits, which took effect 1 July 2004, Chinese administrative authorities have been moving towards only granting administrative permits for which there is a clear legal basis. As such, starting 1 January 2006, local administrations for industry and commerce (AICs) began refusing to carry out liaison office registrations.
The FIE Opinion officially clarify that AICs will no longer approve registrations or extensions for FIE Liaison Offices. Existing registered FIE liaison offices shall be de-registered or converted into company branches upon the expiration of their terms of operation.[41] Although the FIE Opinion confirm that the SAIC will no longer register new FIE representative offices or renew expired liaison office licenses, an SAIC official news release[42] and the SAIC's official answers to reporters[43] indicate that PRC laws do not ban the existence of FIE liaison offices. In fact, FIEs may now directly maintain liaison offices to conduct liaison work without registering them with local AICs. Existing liaison offices must de-register when their current terms of operation expire, but those not engaged in direct "business activities" may continue to operate without an SAIC license. FIEs may also convert liaison offices into branches based on their own needs. However, the FIE Opinion omit this fact and do not provide guidance for liaison offices on practical tasks, such as how to obtain a lease, perform tax registration, hire local employees and pay their social insurance without a license.
The FIE Opinion further clarify that FIE branches may engage in liaison and consultation businesses within the FIE's business scope, while FIE liaison offices shall not engage in any business activities.
With regard to the above, FIEs will be faced with two options: i) to set up branches, which will coincide with additional tax burdens; or ii) to operate unregistered liaison offices, which will have an unwritten legal basis and face various practical difficulties.
Conclusions
The FIE Opinion are a crucial development in foreign investment in China. Apart from the topics discussed above, the FIE Opinion introduce various measures to simplify procedures for FIE registration changes, customs declaration of bonded capital equipment and foreign exchange registrations. The FIE Opinion also improve corporate governance by requiring the organization structure of an FIE, including its board of directors, to observe relevant provisions of the new Company Law.
The revisions to the PRC Company Law and relevant regulations, together with the FIE Opinion, provide a better regulatory framework for foreign investment in China. By taking advantage of the new developments, new investors can achieve more flexible structures with more efficient tax features, while existing FIEs can also take this opportunity to review their investment structures and see whether any improvements can be made. [1] The PRC Company Law, originally adopted by the 5th Session of the Standing Committee of the 8th National People's Congress (NPC) on 29 December 1993, and revised for the third time by the 18th Session of the Standing Committee of the 10th NPC on 27 October 2005, effective on 1 January 2006. [2] The FIE Opinion were adopted by the State Administration of Industry and Commerce (SAIC), the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), the General Administration of Customs (GAC), and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) on 24 April 2006, and released by the SAIC on 10 May 2006.</SP< TD> |
|
|